| Raptor 74 This
is the Raptor 74. A fairly long wheelbase lowracer. The Raptor, because
my youngest daughter thought it looked like a hunting bird. Okaaaay . .
. ? :) The "74" is a "7" for the 700 rear, and the "4"
is for the 451 front. Time permitting, there will also be a Raptor 44, 22
and 77 as well. Anyway, I wanted something lower so the aero profile of
the rider and bike overlap, and with a much better chainline than on my high
racer conversion. I cranked out a quick, but rough, 3D model of it so
that I would have a good idea of the dimensions and angles to start with. The
biggest thing that bothers me is the whole head tube angle and trail specification
"thing". On a trike, I am pretty comfortable with the front end
geometry and what changes cause what effects. On a two wheeler, I'm going
to shoot for a 73ºangle and about 2" of trail to start with. We'll
see how that handles and adjust from there. 
I
also added some long ½" x ½" rectangles to simulate the
chainline. I was concerned with fork clearance, and as the front view shows,
there is good reason for it. The chain appears to have a problem with the
right fork leg. I have a couple ideas on what to do about that so I'll cross
that bridge when I get to it. 
On
to the building n' junk.
| 19 July 2007 The
frame is made of 1½" x .063" box steel tubing. From past experience,
this is more than strong enough for up to a 235lb rider, so in the interest of
keeping th physicalsize of the frame down, and trying to keep the weight close
to the 30lb mark, that's what I used again. I salvaged the front fork and
headtube from a donor 10 speed, and took a 26" MTB front fork, and spread
the legs with a car jack until the 135mm rear hub would fit. I welded the
rear fork directly onto the end of the main backbone and added a little reinforcement
inside to hopefully spread the load a bit. My intention is to have seat supports
run from the seat down to the fork legs, but if it turns out I can't do that,
that's what the internal reinforcing is for :) Before welding, I also made
sure I deburred the inside of all the backbone joints because I also plan to run
internal cabling. The burrs might a) be a pain to navigate over to initially run
the cable, and b) might cause cable chafing issues, so again, I cleaned them up. The
fork was cut and shortened around 3½" to get a closer fit between
the fork crown and the 451 front wheel. The fork, after shortening, was
still too wide and the chain was having clearance issues. I'm still up in the
air over what my best course of action would be, but I have a couple ideas. Unfortunately,
no pictures of the fork shortening, but I'll take lots next time :) |
| | | | 21
July 2007 First, I hooked up the dual chain
idler to control and simplify chain management. A 2" Delrin roller
with sealed 3/8" bearings on either side. Overkill, yes, but it was
the smallest I could find at the time and I'll never have to worry about snapping
a power side idler bolt on this thing :) The chain keeper is a piece of
1" x 1/8" steel with some scrap ¼" rod welded on either
end to keep the chain in the right place. The main keeper strap has a 3/8"
hole in the middle and the idler bolt holds the keeper tight when the whole assembly
is tightened. The Delrin is tough, cheap and quiet. Next,
I had to deal with the chain - fork interference issues and while I could partially
solve it by just moving the chain idler pulley further out from the frame, I didn't
want to push that too far because it would mess with the chain line pretty badly
and it would also put a lot of lateral force on the idler pulley which would no
doubt cause premature failure. So, I pulled out my MAP gas torch, put the
fork back in my little ad-hoc fork jig, heated the fork legs up (one at a time)
and using a soft face hammer, I hammered them inwards about ½". I
also heated the fork legs a little further up and lightly tapped them too so as
to hopefully ease some of the stress on the brazed fork crowns. The fork
leg curves aren't that extreme and give about ¼" of clearance for
both sides of the chain. I plan to run short sections of chain tube, so
I'm happy with that. Cleverly, I forgot to take some before and after pictures. I
took the old cow horn bars that I had intended to use on the highracer, and quickly
mounted them on the Raptor so we could test drive it. I usually like to
let my friend test drive the two wheelers whenever I can. Better him than
me :) Anyway, even with trying to keep the boom as short as feasible by
keeping the pedals close to the front wheel, it was still a fair stretch even
with the seat all the way forward. On the up-side, there is still about
3" of space to move the seat forward if I pop a few more holes in the frame,
so that's no problem. Even after adjusting the seat for me, there was still
about 5" of empty space between the seat back and the front of the rear wheel.
So much for 3D modelling . . . It feels
a little skittish in the steering but it also feels "slow" to maneuver
due to the long wheelbase, but nothing that couldn't be gotten used to. My
friend suggested shortening the boom and bottom frame section to both bring the
boom in and give more cockpit options. We measured the weight distribution
and it was about 69/31 front/rear. Now, I'm not sure what a "proper"
weight distribution would be for a bike like this, but I was anticipating something
in the 60/40 range. My highracer ended up being just the opposite at 40/60
front/rear but that was because the bike's wheelbase was only about 42" and
I didn't want to put a 3' boom out the front, so I had to keep things more rear
oriented. Anyway, aside from the way the handling feels, at least the chain
was working fine and clearing the forks, so I'll have to see if I can come up
with something for the handling, and if not, I'll have to cut the frame. Also,
part of the handling issues might be due to the fact that the steering head angle
is 74º instead of the 73º I was aiming for. That's pretty high
for a road oriented bike unless you're shooting for something extreme like a TT
bike. The reduced steering due to chain - tire clearance is also something
to get used to. Must take gentle corners :) | | | | | 23
July 2007 So, after the initial test
rides and the discussions we had, I figured what the hell, and decided to shorten
the boom and bottom tube. Normally, I don't like to mess with things like
that but the bent was pretty long at nearly 87" and even with the seat adjusted
to where I was comfortable, I had too much empty space between the back of the
seat and the rear wheel. On top of that, shortening the boom would remove
more tendency for boom flex, shorten the bike and push the rider back so I wouldn't
have to shorten the bottom tube as much. I cut 1½" out of the
boom and 2" out of the bottom tube so they are now 15" and 17"
respectively. After brinding and smoothing out the beads, I swapped out
the original handlebar stem I was using, and replaced it with a shorter one to
bring the cow horns back toward the rider more making them easier and more comfortable
to reach. Moving the bars back means they have to be raised a little more
to clear the knees too, but that was expected and I can still see easily over
them. After that, I quick hooked up the shifter
again and with a 2 x 4 block for a seat support I tried another test ride. Wow,
surprising difference! It's very smooth and much easier to ride than it
was before. I imagine it's partly due to the shorter wheelbase, probably
not too much to do with the shorter boom, possibly due to a CoG shift a little
more to the rear, and also maybe because the handlebars are closer which makes
control more comfortable. I think the shorter wheelbase also made it feel
more responsive as well. At any rate, it's a definite improvement and I'm
glad I decided to shorten the bike. Tomorrow, seat supports and headrest
if I have time.. | | | | | 24
July 2007 Today I focused on getting the seat
supports and headrest done. I used some 1" x 3/16" AL flat stock
for the seat supports, and some old pieces of 1"ID SS tubing from old seat
projects. I took the curved section of tubing to used as the main headrest
tube and used a shorter 5" piece across it in a "T" to put a piece
of 1" plumbing pipe foam on. The inside of the SS tube is reinforced
with an AL tube where the tube is bolted to the seat. I wanted it to be
stronger so it wouldn't get crushed while tightening the bolts. I got my
daughter to help me locate the headrest for the proper height and I can always
tweak the bent section to properly locate it fore and aft, after I decide what
seat angle I want to ride this baby at. For
the seat supports, I drilled a ¼" bolt hole in the top of the supports
so that bolt will hold the seat support to the seat and it will also hold the
headrest. I drilled 3 lightening holes, and then 5 or 6 holes for a 65mm
skewer to go through. I welded a ½" steel tube with 1/8" wall
across the underside of the frame tube and the skewer goes through the seat supports
and the tube to hold the seat in place. The skewer makes it easy to adjust
the seat angle or loosen it to move it forward for shorter riders. I
also managed to get the front derailleur tube on and a small SS tube to act as
cable guide by the base of the derailleur. I'm using a Deore MTB FD so to
keep things simple, I had to run the FD cable down the right side of the boom.
I'll put the cable housing stop on later back towards the head tube. | | | | | 25
July 2007 Tonight I got on the tiller steering.
I chopped the original stem I was testing with, and welded in an extra 9½"
of 1" steel tube from an old seat tube. A friend of mine sold me an
extra compressor he had so I fired up my little mini belt sander to clean up the
tubes after welding and it did a great job. I took some old plastic brake
levers with steel housings, chopped the tube clamp off the housings and welded
them to a piece of 1" x 1/8" mild steel, about 2" long. I
welded that to the underside of the tiller bar and left a little of the levers
sticking out behind the handlebars. Later, if they prove to be too long,
I can easily chop them off and smooth the ends, plus, the plastic is tres light
:) The setup might not be the most sophisticated looking thing, but it is
simple and works great so we'll see how the braking power is with them in that
position. I just hope I remember to use my thumbs for panicky stops at the
beginning of riding it. I also got the front derailleur cable stop welded
on. | | | | | 27
July 2007 Nothing much done tonight aside
from trying to decide, with my friend, what kind of bars I should use. It
handles really well with the bull horns, but it feels a little skittish when using
the praying hamster tiller. From experience with my highracer, I know I
can and will get used to riding fast and hard with my hands close together because
that's pretty much the only way I ride now on the highracer. The bonus with
the praying hamster is that I believe it is more aero than the bull horns, and
the thumb brakes are right there where I like to have my hands anyway. My
friend really likes the bull horns so we'll likely go with those for him on his
Raptor 44, but I think I will opt initially for the praying hamster bars and see
how they feel after a while. | | | | 28
July 2007 Today was a lot of tweaking and
fine tuning and grinding. I hate it when I get to this part of the build
because there is a lot of time spent but not much visible progress. So,
I cleaned up a bunch of the beads still left untouched, I added reinforcement
to the top tube - down tube joint as well as the bottom tube - down tube joint.
I think these would get the most stress so to be on the safe side, I added
some gussets out of the same material as the frame was made from. I also
added 4 small tabs for the tailbox supports on the rear forks. A small AL
plate on each side will act as the base for the tailbox storage because I want
the extra strength for when I start using it to commute. | | | | 29
July 2007 Today I wanted to get the lead out
and get it road worthy to try a quick ~50km ride on Monday just to see what it's
like on the road when I start to get used to it. It actually feels quite
a bit like the highracer, but it also feels "tighter" and definitely
a little smoother/faster. Anyway, the list of final tasks: - take
the wire wheel to the entire frame and take the rest of the paint off the forks.
- weld
some small zip-tie mounts on the front forks so some shorty chain tubes can float
there and help stop the chain from hitting the fork leg on turns and bumps. Then,
paint the forks.
- fill and clean up all the extra seat adjustment holes
that I cleverly drilled and will never be used. :)
- drill the holes in
the frame and tiller bar for the internal cable routing.
- add a light mount
on the front of the BB shell.
- get the thing together for a quick 15km
or so test ride before tomorrow.
I managed
to get everything done and out for a 18km test ride. I am very happy with
how this thing handles! On a couple of the stretches of road, I was 3 or
4kph faster than what I normally am doing on the highracer and it really feels
almost effortless so far. The thumb shifters work really well and there
is no problem applying enough force to stop fast. Turning with the bent
and trying to deal with the chain - tire interference was not a problem at all
and I think it will be all but unnoticed in very short order. I'm looking
forward to the long ride tomorrow and comparing the time and speed to what I can
do it in with the highracer. It also feels smoother as you lean into the
corners but doesn't seem as nimble as the highracer so I need to look further
ahead a little on the road to make sure I miss any big bumps and holes. Partly
due to the wheelbase, but also likely because the rear wheel is "flying",
the ride is very supple and even with the 120psi tires, small bumps and road cracks
are not sharp at all. I was wondering if I needed to consider suspension,
but I'm not wondering OR considering any more. While I am planning to make
a triple set of 54/42/30 ovals for it, the 39T small ring seemed more than low
enough at present to make it up the local hills. I'll see for sure though
tomorrow on my longer ride. The internal cable
routing was much easier than I anticipated and I didn't even need to use the "vacuum
& thread" trick. The internal cables really clean up the lines
and yes, I DO plan to use the lime green cable housing on the finished bike :)
The little chain tubes at the front fork worked awesome and they made zero sound,
or at least nothing I could hear over the wind roaring in my ears :) The
chain sometimes hits the end of the right side rear brake arm, but that is easily
fixed. The only real thing I need to tweak is the headrest angle. I
need to bend it forward by about an inch because it's not quite in the right spot
yet. I don't ride using a headrest, but I have found that they do come in
handy when I'm slogging hard up a hill. I need to find a good spot for water
bottles too. I use a 70 oz camel back bladder in a butt pouch slung off
my hip to the side and that works ok, but I'd like something to hold a couple
bottles on the side of the seat somewhere. I plan to add a bladder compartment
at the tailbox front anyway, but still would like a bidon or two somewhere. I'd
also like to see about some wheel disks too. Aside
from that, after the ride tomorrow, I'll paint a few more items, deal with the
chain - brake caliper issue, tweak the headrest angle, and start working on a
tailbox design with suitable storage. | | | | | | 30
July 2007 Today was a nice day and I needed minimal
stuff with me to go to work, so I took the Raptor instead of Xine. It takes a
little bit of paying attention to take bigger radius turns with the chain/wheel
overlap, but I quickly got the hang of it and had no rubbing issues at all on
the commute, in or back. Now that I can directly compare the performance of the
highracer and the lowracer on the exact same stretches of road, the performance
difference is pretty evident. On average, on flat road or slightly climbing, the
lowracer is 5 to 10kph faster than the highracer. On a downhill, of pretty much
any kind, a 10 to 15kph higher speed with the lowracer is pretty much standard.
Not only is the lowracer faster on downhills, but it also carries more speed,
for longer distances, after a downhill and when starting up a hill. The ride in
was not at maximum effort, by far, and in concert with trying to get used to how
the Raptor handles, the seat was too far forward and the seat was not laid back
enough. Even with that, I still beat the best time on my highracer by over 4 minutes.
I can hardly wait to see what I can do once I get the seat dialed in and actually
try for a PB. On the ride home, I goofed up and didn't start the ride timer for
the first 3 or 4km, so I estimated it at about 7 minutes. 7 minutes is pretty
slow because I normally cover the first 8km in 10 or 11 minutes, but I screwed
up, so I'll have lots of time to see how fast I can make the return commute. Anyway,
even with the very slow estimate at the start, I was still at the old start point
in 44:30, which is almost 1 minute faster than my best time on the highracer,
and again, I wasn't pushing as hard as I was on the highracer. To be honest,
the overall performance boost was a surprise. I figured it would be a little
faster because it felt tighter and smoother than the highracer, but I didn't expect
the performance that I've gotten so far out of it. I have a couple ideas
why too. First, the wind resitance is noticeably
less. A combination of being lower to the ground where the wind isn't as
smooth or strong, and the fact that my body's aero profile overlaps much more
of the bent's aero profile. On the highracer, the bike and my wind profile
are pretty much stacked one on top of the other rather than about 80% overlapped
like on the Raptor. The seat angle on the Raptor is about 29º vs the 35º
on the highracer, and that seems to make a big difference in how much air I'm
pushing too. Second, I think the 140mm cranks
are a fairly big, and quite noticeable, improvement over the 130mm cranks on the
highracer and the Speed. It is much easier to accelerate on the Raptor than
the highracer. When I pedal hard, the acceleration is much more evident with the
140's but on the 130's, if I push hard it often results in knee pain. The longer
cranks also help me push taller gears and/or higher cadences which helps carry
more speed, for longer on the hills, and then accelerating away at the top of
the hills. Lastly, right now I'm using a 52/39
biopace double. I rotated them so they line up better with a recumbent layout
and they might also be having an effect on the overall speed increase. In the
end, I'm going to make a 54/42/30 oval triple with 10% ovality for the Raptor,
but the double seems to be working fine for now. So,
with my theories on the speed increase at least formulated in part, I'll take
it all apart, and start painting it up. I'd like to have it all painted
and assembled for the club TT on Thursday. Hopefully all/enough of the bugs
are out of it that I can race it confidently. I need to tweak the headrest
though and bend it a little closer to my head. | | | | 1
Aug 2007 So, Tuesday I took it all apart
and painted it. I wanted a burgundy kind of colour, and thought hat was what the
paint can lid looked like, but it turned out to be more brownish than purpley-reddish.
It's ok, I still like it. The headrest isn't painted yet because I'm
not done tweaking it yet and once I get the proper seat angle and headrest clearance,
I'll paint it flat black. Some people would consider the lime green cable
housing . . . "garish", but I like the contrast. I think the internal
cable routing makes it less of an eye-sore. | | | The
front view does a fairly lousy job of showing the narrowed front forks . . . and
that's a GOOD thing, because that indicates my heating and hammering job worked
to bring the fork legs in and out of the way. I put some teflon tape on
the right fork leg where the little chain tubes are, and that set-up is working
better than planned. No noise, no problems. |  | | This
shot is actually a pretty poor shot because it doesn't show the bar end shifters,
or the internal shifter cable routing. Nice . . . Anyway, the thumb
brakes work great and were a design feature I stole from the boys at the recumbents.com
forum. Some of the guys used them on their NoComs to try to get a more
aero profile and I wanted to use it so that I didn't have a bit of a rat's nest
of cables and levers sticking out like the 2nd picture. | | | The
last shot shows the rear seat support and adjustment, the headrest mount and the
4 small tabs welded to the top of the chainstays. The small tabs are hard
mounts for the tailbox that I'm going to add shortly. I'm using to long,
narrow pieces of .040" AL sheet to act as a more rigid base for the coroplast
tailbox. It'll provide excellent rigidity without having to do a lot of
extra reinforcing of the tailbox shape and it'll prevent the tailbox from sagging
under the weight of the junk I take to work with me each day. I ran some
more strips of clear teflon tape down the tops of the chainstays to keep the AL
pieces from rattling against the steel, but they're pretty much invisible in this
picture. | | | | | 2
Aug 2007 Tonight, I did the bike club's 15km
TT and rode the Raptor instead of the highracer. No problems on the ~10km
warm-up ride to the start and the new bent was very smooth, very comfortable and
very easy to cruise in the high 30's. A couple little gremlins reared their
heads though. After I took off from the start
of the TT, a couple km down the road, and the return chain came out from under
the little derailleur pulley and jammed. I had to coast for a little bit,
but got it back in place, and hit the gas again. A few minutes later, on
a little rough section, it came off again and jammed, AND this time the chain
was twisted completely sideways and it took more effort and time to get it untwisted
and back in the groove while coasting. Obviously it was a flawed design,
and while being pissed off that I waited until the time trial to discover this
fact, I could hear my friend's voice in my head telling me to "just use a
little piece of chain tube!". So, a little while later, it derailled
a third time (all before the 7km mark), twisted itself into a quasi-Mobius loop
again, and this time I just reached down, managed to jerk it out, and just dropped
the chain on top of the whole idler assembly and tried to hammer out the rest
of the TT as best I could. The chain was making a little noise from rattling
on the top, but it didn't seem to be hampering my performance any. The
2nd little glitch ocurred at the 7.5km turn-around. Due to the reduced steering
range and the narrow road the TT is held on, I was trying to come up with a smooth,
quick, and hopefully not too clumsy looking method of getting the Raptor turned
180 degrees and headed back the other way. Still being mad at the whole
idler issue, as I approached the turn-around, I decided to say screw it, take
the turn hot, stick my left leg out like and outrigger, crank the lowracer hard
on its left side and see if I could carve the corner hard and not end up in the
shoulder (where I wiped out in the sand and threw the chain off the chainrings
on a previous "test" attempt). I slowed down to around the low
20's, executed my planned maneuver, and the Raptor carved around the 180º
corner like it was on rails, neither wheel slid out, I cleared the other shoulder
by almost 6" and I managed to smoothly pull out of the power-turn, get my
left foot clipped back in first try and I accelerated away from the turn. I
was so happy I didn't even care about the three chain derailments before that!
The bottom picture shows the technique but it doesn't look to be leaned
over as far as it felt like it was. It was a very cool feeling and one I'll
have to practice some more to get consitent at, but at least now I know I can
do something like that if I have to. After that, I kept the hammer down,
kept my HR at as close to 180BPM as I could and waited for the finish line to
appear. I managed to cross the line at 22:08 which was almost 3 minutes
faster than my best time on the highracer, and a new PB by a wide margin. I
really am amazed at how fast the Raptor is and am looking forward to trying the
last TT of the year and see what I can do when I don't have to do rolling maintenance
in the middle of a race. | | | | | 3
Aug 2007 Time for a new chain idler with a
simplified chain tube for the return side as my friend initially suggested. I
made a little 17T pulley out of a piece of .080" 7075 using Giles
Pucket's little app and made a small AL bearing carrier for an old 5/8"
sealed bearing I had kicking around. The bearing goes in the carrier, the
sprocket screws onto the face of the carrier with 3 screws and further secures
the pressed-in bearing. Two small Al adapters act as spacers to hold the idler
in the proper location and also reduce the bearing's ID to .375 to match the old
idler's mounting plate. A piece of 16 gauge steel bent into a "J"
acts as both the chain keeper for the sprocket and also the mount for the chain
tube. I'll make another inner spacer that is a little shorter because the
idler sticks out a little further than I would like. I'll try a few km with
it the way it is right now and make sure it's going to work like I hope it is. I
also tweaked the headrest angle and have it in a pretty comfortable spot now,
so I painted it and put a piece of 1" plumbing insulation foam on it. I
need to repair a small tear in the seat mesh from my first unsuccessful power-turn
attempt and then the next update should have something to do with the tailbox
and/or the new oval chainrings :) 
| |
| 11
Aug 2007 I've been primarily focusing on the
Raptor 44, and started assembling pieces for the 44i so haven't really advanced
the '74's tailbox for new chainrings, but the idler was bugging me. It was
out from the frame about ¼" too far, so I spun it around, made a smaller
spacer for it, made a new chain keeper and moved the return side chain tube up
higher to give the return side a more relaxed path from the chainring to rear
derailleur. In the previous idler picture you can see the return side of the chain
is actually turning sideways a little. That has been fixed with the new
setup. | |
| 18
Aug 2007 I took the Raptor to the local 15km
TT again and was very happy with its performance. It was quite a bit windier
than last time and cooler with thicker air, but I was only 19 seconds off my PB
and the bike was smooth, comfortable and the headrest and modded chain idler worked
without a hitch. I was feeling pretty good on the ~12km warm down ride back
and all of a sudden the bent felt very hard to pedal and I started smelling burning
rubber. ?? I hopped off it and discovered the headrest was very close
to the tire for some reason and I couldn't believe that I had bent it because
I don't push back with my neck like that. On further investigation, I found
that the frame had failed at the bottom rear joint. I don't think the bead
actually failed, but rather the metal around it. The right side, bottom
and half of the left side had cracked open, and I was able to gingerly ride it
back the remaining couple of kms without a full failure. Gotta' love steel! :)
With so little steel still holding it together yet, I think the culprit
was me thinning the metal a little too much while cleaning up the bead and the
rough road to, at and from the TT. I'm glad it failed when and where it
did though because I didn't end up stranded. So,
I tore the bike down enough to get at the crack, took a wire wheel to it to remove
the paint and mae a couple doublers out of 1/8" steel. Realigned and
clamped the frame, welded on the doublers, cleaned up the beads a little and painted
it up. 
Still
need to get a tailbox made and I'm in the process of making the oval triple rings
for it. | |
| 12
May 2008 I finally got around to making the
tailbox for the Raptor because I didn't want to commute on the highracer again
and the Speed . . . was not. :) I had a few criteria for the tailbox, very
similar to the Speed's. This box was going to be as wide as my shoulders this
time to see if I couldn't get some more cargo space, plus it would play fender
and I'd try to make it match something a little more aero. Something like a RazzFazz
tailbox or like LeeW's trike tailbox. I also wanted it to be easy to remove,
preferably without tools so I can easily run stock or super-stock whenever I want. After
16 hours and about 350 zip ties, what I came up with is to the right. It
has tons of storage, which I'm very happy with, and the AL base plates I added
on each side of the chainstays provides lots of firm support for the extra size
box and I can easily remove the tailbox by undoing 2 thumb screws pictured right.
I'll add two more in a day or so. I also added to smaller compartment
bulkheads near the front on each side. The one on the right is for my water
bladder and the one on the left is for tools and spares. I'm still deciding
where I'm going to put the flag mount. Trial run is tomorrow and in the evening
I'll start on the wheel discs. Full construction details are here.
Front and rear views of the tailbox are below so you can see a general idea
of the shape.

| |
| 13
May 2008 After a couple false starts tonight,
I finally got the rear wheel discs made. I made them out of some .3mm plastic
sheet that is used to wrap insulation on steam pipes and such. It's a little
thick, maybe, for this application, but I managed to get the drive side nice and
tight so as not to rub on the big ring or the rear derailleur cage. Both
sides came out pretty well and I'm much happier with the end result than I was
with my first attempt(s) on the Mk
3. I need to decide what I'm going to do with the valve stem, which
will be accessed from the non-drive side, and then I'll spray paint the discs
flat black. I was also feeling in the mood
and the new high-tech SRAM
Red cassette. The fabrication process is pretty cool but it's got an additional
"revolutionary" aspect in that it has a number of teeth shaved off each
cog. It's also very light at about 155g. Supposedly the shaved teeth provides
a big improvement in shifting. Well, on the cheap, I decided to make the
SRAM MTB version out of my 11/34 cassette and at a paltry 440g, it could use some
shaving too. Cleverly I marked the teeth to be shaved in pretty much the
same orientation as the Red's. I left the 11T intact and marked 1 more on
the opposite side one each of the three biggest cogs. 7 minutes later, including
cleaning and reassembly, I produced what I will dub the SRAM Crimson. If
you look close, you can see the staggered path of shaved teeth leading out from
the 9 o'clock position, and a smaller area in roughly the 3 o'clock position.
After finishing up, I was horrified to realize that at least one of the
biggest rings has THREE shaved teeth! So much for my R&D department.
They're SO fired! The new weight of the cassette is a svelt 425g and
had I known about that extra tooth that could have been removed, I could have
taken even more weight off for even better shifting and more weight savings! I'll
see how much better the shifting works tomorrow. I hope I didn't hose a
perfectly good cassette . . . | |
| 14
May 2008 Well, I got 25km on the "SRAM
Crimson" and it didn't work worse than before I ground the teeth off.
It didn't seem to have a noticeable improvement in shifting either. While
the new cassette is definitely light, any shifting immprovement might be able
to be summed up with two words: GIMM and ICK. We had company tonight
for a little while so I didn't get a lot of time in the garage, but I did manage
to install the other two anchor mounts for the tailbox and I got the left side
wheel disc painted flat black. I wasn't happy with a few ripples in the left side
disc, so I tightened that up a little before I painted it. Both sides worked great
as well on the 25km test ride but what kind of speed bonus they give me is anybody's
guess. I also made a little doghouse cover for the valve stem and made a couple
spare covers to carry with me. I'll see if I can put up some pictures of
it tomorrow. Tomorrow I'll try to make the front wheel discs and paint the
power side of the rear wheel. |
| 20
May 2008 The same type of plastic wheel discs
were made for the front and installed, and painted. I did a commute on it and
put about 60km on them. The bike looks nice, I think, but the front wheel
discs make the steering pretty wiggy when there is a strong wind. Inside
a velodrome or on a guaranteed calm day, they'd likely be fine but for now, it's
not exactly confidence inspiring to ride with them. So, off comes the front discs.
On the upside, I think I have a better, simpler, cleaner looking way to make discs
and they can be removed and installed in seconds. I just need to see if
I can find the parts I need to do what I have in mind. | |
| 21
May 2008 With mounting the tailbox, every
time it leans against something, it scuffs the paint job. Not acceptable.
So, I decided to mount a kickstand and just happened to have a candidate that
worked out perfectly for it. The first picture is the small mount I made
for it using ¼" plate and a couple small pieces of 1/8" steel.
It slips over the lower frame and bolts on using a ¼" bolt. Next
picture shows it mounted. It's plenty rigid and I made sure not to tighten
the mounting bolt too tight because I didn't want to crush the main frame. The
next picture shows the bike on the stand. I wiggled and wobbled the bike
around and there is no tendency to try and tip over. Sweet :) The picture
below shows the kick stand stowed with the tailbox on. I can reach down quick
when I stop, and flick the kickstand out with my hand before I even stand up.
I'm very happy with it :) Maybe I'll paint it flat black too . . . 
| |
| 4
Jul 2008 The pictures are from the Waterford
MI races on June 21st and 22nd. The Raptor had both complete sets of wheel
discs until I lost the one side off teh front during a wind gust in the first
couple laps of the 1 hour TT. So much for that wheel disc fastening scheme :)
Other than that, teh new oval rings and teh rear wheel disc worked great.
I ran it in stock class instead of super stock because I wanted to run in the
same class as the "big-dogs" and see how I faired. (get it? :)) Anyway,
aside from my fitness level lacking and grinding a little too much in the 200ft
sprint, I was pretty happy with the Raptor's performance but there are some issues
I want to deal with. The bottom picture is
the start of the 25 lap race. The red arrow is me, the 3 green arrows are Bill
"The Cannon" Hannon, Warren Beauchamp and Doug Jacobs. They are
all on NoComs and you can see how much higher and how much more upright I am than
they are. My intent was to make the Raptor as low as a NoCom, but I obviously
missed the mark. Frame-wise, I'm even a little higher than an M5 or a Baron.
I could really feel the wind pushing against me in some of the races and
if I had been smart, I would have asked one of the NoCom guys if I could maybe
try their bike. At any rate, the one event
combined two aspects. You started at the bottom of a small hill and sprinted
to the top. When you crested the hill, you stopped pedalling and tried to coast
as far as you could. I did ok at the hill climb and got 3rd, but with all that
speed, I only got 6th in the coast-down. Why? Well I was probably
one of the heaviest low-racer guys there and the weight of the Raptor is definitely
more than the other lowracers, so that weight plus the speed should have helped
more, but it didn't and I have some ideas about that. | | | Factor | Effect | Fix | | Tire
pressure | They were pretty much topped up, but I likely could have
checked again. This might be a small factor due to the combined weight of
me and the bike so mushier tires likely slowed me up some. | Don't be a
moron, and check the tires before each race. | | Less areo | You
can see how much higher I am than the real lowracers, and my seat angle is higher
too so I think this was a bigger factor. More wind drag to be sure. | Change
the seat construction so the bottom angle is 30º and the top is 45º,
then lay the seat back to at LEAST 25º and install a headrest for constant
neck support. Lower the frame a bunch more, which means I'll shorten the
head tube so I can still see forward, likely add indirect steering because of
the lower seat angle and I might need to make the boom adjust a little too. | | Better
hubs | Every little thing adds up and the low cost hubs quite likely
added rolling drag as well. | Install better quality ball bearings, use
ceramics or lace up better hubs. | | Weight | Weight
reduction will obviously help in acceleration and on hill climbing. The
less weight I have to accelerate, the faster I can accelerate - a no brainer there.
It should also help reduce the tire drag by making them mush down less. | Losing
the weight off me should come easier as I train to get in better shape. Losing
the weight off the bike will be tougher because everything I build tends to end
up in the 43 lb area for trikes and the 35 lb range for bikes because that is
what the materials I can use weigh. In the end, I need to lose weight and
get stronger - a win win, IMO. |
Now,
don't get me wrong. I am not about to start cutting on the Raptor 74.
It's a great bike and a lot of fun to commute on and I'm not going to try
to convert it into something that is faster and lower. I simply take the
mods, and based off the Raptor, I make a new bike and see how the mods work out.
I am not that overly concerned about it all to be honest, and I am very happy
with the results but I want to see if I can fine-tune my craft a little bit more
and take my results and push every one of them up for a new PB at Waterfod next
year. Due to my schedule I likely won't be able to go do much more racing
this year anyway, so I'll have lots of time to train, build, and did I mention
train? | | | |
The specs are the following:
| Length: | 83½" |
| Height: | 33" (top of bars) |
| Width: | 14" (handlebar
& seat width ) | | Wheelbase: | 54" |
| Seat height: | 11½" |
| BB height: | 20¼" |
| Ground clearance: | 7½" |
| Head tube angle: | 74º | | Trail: | 1
5/8" | | Rake: | 2" |
| Seat angle: | 31º (adjustable) |
| Weight: | 32lbs |
| Front wheel: | AL 451, 36H, Schwalbe
Stelvio | | Rear wheel: | AL
700, 36H, Schwalbe Stelvio | | Gear inches: | 31.29
to 132.36 | | Weight bias: | 62f/38r |
Main |